Shat  terd



The hidden half of domestic violence

How to have eternal life

 New look at 'deadbeat dads' Cathy Young

The Boston Globe
Monday, February 11, 2002

New look at 'deadbeat dads'
by Cathy Young

ONE CLAUSE in the budget President Bush submitted to Congress last week
has unexpectedly brought attention to the plight of ''dead-broke dads.''

Under the president's proposal, child support payments by noncustodial
fathers whose children are on welfare will go directly to the family
rather than to a government bureaucracy. The idea is that such an
arrangement will allow fathers a more direct role in their children's
lives and give them more of an incentive to stay involved.

This initiative, which has bipartisan support, has also given rise to a
much-needed discussion of the problems faced by poor fathers, who
often struggle with onerous child support payments that make it virtually
impossible for them to stay afloat. It's an issue that fathers' rights
activists have been trying to raise for some time, only to face accusations
of making excuses for men who want to evade their responsibilities.

In a society sensitive to stereotypes, few groups have as bad an image as
the divorced or unmarried father. He is ''Daddy Meanest'' - a title the
media gave to Jeffrey Nichols, the investment banker who was said to be
living in luxury with his new wife while owing $600,000 to his three children.

The idea that divorced men make out like bandits, leaving women and
children in the dust, owes much to Lenore Weitzman's 1985 book ''The
Divorce Revolution.'' With her sound-bite conclusion (based on a 1977
study) that the standard of living drops 73 percent for women after
divorce and rises 42 percent for men, Weitzman became one of America's
most quoted.

Some scholars questioned these numbers from the start. In 1996, after
another scholar reanalyzed Weitzman's data and found a huge error in her
computations, she admitted the mistake (blaming a computer foul-up). The
revised data yielded a 10 percent increase in living standards for men and
a 27 percent decline for women in Weitzman's sample. But that was in 1977;
since then, women's earnings have risen and child support collections have

There is also the issue of tax-code provisions which heavily favor the
custodial parent. In his 1999 book ''Divorced Dads: Shattering the
Myths,'' Arizona State University researcher Sanford Braver reports the
result of an extensive study which found that among typical divorced
couples with two children, both parents suffer a slight decline in their
living standards.

The cliches of ''The Divorce Revolution'' have largely driven our policies
toward noncustodial fathers since the mid-1980s. Yet the deadbeat dad
story has another side. In a 1996 article in the Christian Science
Monitor, an official at the district attorney's office in Oklahoma City
wrote that he had ''prosecuted one deadbeat dad who had been hospitalized
for malnutrition and another who lived in the bed of a pickup truck.''

One study found that among fathers with no employment problems in the past
year, 5 percent paid nothing and 81 percent paid in full; among those who
worked in seasonal jobs or had been unemployed, 45 percent paid in full
and over a third paid nothing. The men on the deadbeat dads most wanted
lists are not businessmen or brain surgeons but primarily unskilled laborers.

Of course, men who father children they can't support are irresponsible -
as are the women who have those children. But no conservative has ever
bashed welfare moms as viciously as conservatives and liberals bash
''deadbeat dads.'' Most welfare opponents stress that women on public
assistance want to be self-sufficient but are trapped by a bad system;
''deadbeat dad'' rhetoric nearly always assumes that the men wilfully
refuse to support their children. And, while everyone recognizes that
women who fall on hard times need help, a man who owes child support
may not find much sympathy when he loses a job.

Urban Institute scholar Elaine Sorensen has reported that only 4 percent
of fathers are able to get their child support payments reduced when their
earnings drop by more than 15 percent. Judges tend to proceed on the
assumption that the man's income will eventually get back to its former
level. Even if a reduction is granted, it takes as long as six months -
while arrearages mount. This is an especially important issue now that
we are in the middle of a recession.

In recent years, we have started to recognize that fathers are parents
too. This means that fathers, like mothers, have the obligation to raise
and support their children. It also means that fathers, like mothers,
deserve compassion and support when they make a good-faith effort.

Cathy Young is a contributing editor at Reason magazine.
Her column appears regularly in the Globe.

This story ran on page A15 of the Boston Globe on 2/11/2002.

Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.
Boston Globe Home:
Related articles:

'Deadbeat' dads - or just 'dead broke'?
Tough collection tactics ignore economic realities, more critics now say
by Silja J. A. Talvi -- Christian Science Monitor, 04 Feb 02

Finding Common Ground on Poor Deadbeat Dads
by BLAINE HARDEN -- NYTimes, 03 Feb 02

'Dead Broke' Dads' Child-Support Struggle
by BLAINE HARDEN -- NYTimes, 29 Jan 02


(please click above to vote for this site)

JUNE is Domestic Violence Against Men Awareness MonthJUNE is Domestic Violence Against Men Awareness Month

Contact us

Interactive Groups


Ken's Page

Jerusalem Daily/Shattered Men

 Read  Guest Book  Sign

Shattered Men Group