Shat  terd


The hidden half of domestic violence

How to have eternal life

Ex-wife sued in fatherhood row,5481,2826187,00.html
The Herald Sun  [AUS]
September 11, 2001
Ex-wife sued in fatherhood row
by Mark Dunn
A PRECEDENT-setting damages case, by a man suing his former wife over the
alleged illegitimacy of her children, will go ahead in Melbourne.
The man claims DNA tests have proven two of the woman's children, for whom
he had paid years of child support, were fathered by another man.
He has filed documents with the County Court alleging fraud and is suing
his former spouse for a figure believed to be about $400,000.
He claims loss of money through child support and anxiety and depression
after allegedly discovering the children were not his.
The pre-teen children are aware of the dispute and have received
The man faced a childcare bill of $178,063 from 1992 until this year and
had paid $30,388 before discontinuing his support.
The court documents call for the woman to outline any sexual relationships
she had with men outside the marriage in the period when both children
were conceived.
The woman has also been asked to disclose when and how she realised the
children were not her husband's.
The couple were married in 1988 and in 1990 a boy was born, followed by a
girl in 1991.
The man claims that at all times his then wife was aware the children were
not his.
In the documents, the man has asked his former wife about statements she
allegedly made after the births, which led him to believe the children
were his.
The documents also seek her comment on the development of the children's
facial features which were said to be inconsistent with his own.
The name of a second man is included in the documents, with allegations he
is the real father of the children.
Access is also sought to a diary the woman may have kept, in which an
admission about the real father might have been made.
Melbourne DNA specialists have said up to 30 per cent of men seeking DNA
tests for paternity, because of suspected infidelity, are found not to be
the biological fathers of the children they support.
A three-day civil trial in the County Court at Melbourne has been set down
for April next year.
 2001 Herald and Weekly Times
Herald Sun Home:

Editors note:  It has long been our thought that anyone that knowingly gets money for something they KNOW the person paying is NOT responsible for should be arrested and tried for fraud.   Forcing a  man to pay for a child that is knowingly not his is a crime for which he will be paying for the next 18 to20 years and it is sanctioned by the court.  Once again, where is the EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW for these men?


(please click above to vote for this site)

JUNE is Domestic Violence Against Men Awareness Month

Contact us

Interactive Groups


Ken's Page

Jerusalem Daily/Shattered Men

 Read  Guest Book  Sign

Shattered Men Group